In the ongoing drama that is United States Federal government, a shutdown is looming over the shear idiocy of idiot-loges on both sides of the aisle attempting the rule and not govern. All 537 politicians elected to federal office are in need of a good spanking.
First, here are some impacts:
According to the Office of Management and Budget, a government shutdown will cost taxpayers an extra $40-60 million per day.
The District of Columbia is reporting that a shutdown will cost the city about $2 million per day in lost revenues.
Maryland and Virginia has not reported their potential economic impact of a shutdown.
UPDATE (4:40pm): Local news reports say that over 835,000 workers will be effected by a shutdown with at least 80-percent being in the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area. Some estimates are saying that it could cost the region up to $20 million per day.
What does this mean for the money manufacturing bureaus of the country?
The U.S. Mint is not answering inquiries about pending shutdown. Media is directed to contact OMB for more information. UPDATE (1:40pm): The U.S. Mint will not allow tours of the Philadelphia and Denver mints during a government shutdown.
Office of Management and Budget is not answering the telephone. Rather, they requested that an email be sent with detailed questions. Email inquiries have yet to be answered.
When calling the Bureau of Engraving and Printing, their phone is either busy or when trying to get past the voice response system for the Office of External Relations, the system says “the person you attempted to reach is unavailable.” An email was sent to the BEP’s general inquiry account and OMB asking about the operations at the BEP. UPDATE (3:30pm): An email note was received from the BEP saying to contact a spokesperson at the Department of the Treasury. Telephone and email messages have not been returned. UPDATE (4:10pm): Both the Washington and Fort Worth plants will not hold tours if there is a government shutdown at midnight tonight.
Since the Federal Reserve is an independent organization and not subject to congressional appropriations, they will remain open during a shutdown. The shutdown will not affect the launch of the new $100 Federal Reserve Note planned for October 8.
Operations of the following bureaus are funded from sources other than annual Congressional appropriations, and would operate normally if a government shutdown were to occur: the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), the United States Mint, and the Bureau of Engraving and Printing (BEP).
This post will be updated as new information is provided.
Representatives of these agencies may contact me via email to provide additional information. Please note that I do respect the confidentiality of sources!
NOTE: I am not a member of any political party. I am a proponent of government employees who do not deserve the way they are being treated by the elected officials.
In one of those news items from while I was away, Secretary of the Treasury Jacob J. “Jack” Lew put pen to official paper and provided an autograph that will appear on United States Federal Reserve Note. Treasury reports that Lew’s signature will first appear on Series 2013 five-dollar notes that will be issued this fall. No plans were announced for other denominations.
Lew, whose autograph has been called “lewpty” and been compared to the decorative icing on a Hostess cupcake, made a promise to the president that he would do better with his penmanship. During his confirmation hearing, Lew told Sen. Max Baucus (D-MT), Chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, that he promised the president he would do better. This did not satisfy those with an ironic sense for the different when a petition appeared on the White House website to “Save the Lewpty-Lew.”
Mock-up of how Treasury Secretary Jack Lew’s autograph will appear on the Series 2013 $5 Federal Reserve Note in the Fall.
Remember as you were growing up spending time with a piece of paper practicing your signature? I wonder if Lew was doing this in his spare time?
While Lew’s autograph lost many of his infamous lewpts at least he did not go to the extreme that of predecessor, Tim Geithner. Geithner’s autograph was very readable and lacked character. At least Lew kept some of his lewpts. It will make for interesting conversations for currency collectors in the future as they examine the autographs on their collectibles.
Images courtesy of the U.S. Department of the Treasury.
The redesign of the $100 note was announced with a press release that was to be held on April 21, 2010 at the Department of the TreasuryCash Room with all of the usual suspects: then Secretary of the Treasury Timothy Geithner, Chairman of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System Ben Bernanke, Treasurer of the United States Rosie Rios, and the since retired Director of the United States Secret Service Mark Sullivan.
The date of the announcement, the Bureau of Engraving and Printing and Federal Reserve announced that Chairman of the Federal Reserve Board Ben S. Bernanke said, “When the new design $100 note is issued on February 10, 2011, the approximately 6.5 billion older design $100s already in circulation will remain legal tender.”
Throughout the summer of 2010, the BEP and Federal Reserve released a lot of training and education materials in anticipation of the release of the new notes.
Everything seemed to be going well until October 1, 2010 when the Federal Reserve “announced a delay in the issue date of the redesigned $100 note.” The Federal Reserve and BEP said that there was a problem with creasing of the paper during the printing process. That was the last we heard from the Federal Reserve until today’s announcement.
Magnified images of the creasing showing up on the new $100 notes.
We consider the delayed introduction of the NexGen $100 note to be a production failure that potentially could have been avoided and has already resulted in increased costs. We found that BEP did not (1) perform necessary and required testing to resolve technical problems before starting full production of the NexGen $100 note, (2) implement comprehensive project management for the NexGen $100 note program, and (3) adequately complete a comprehensive cost-benefit analysis for the disposition of the approximately 1.4 billion finished NexGen $100 notes already printed but not accepted by FRB. [Federal Reserve Board]
After the report noted that the BEP basic responded by saying that they were sorry and are looking into it, the OIG caved and said that even though the BEP was bad, the corrective actions “are responsive to our recommendations.”
Then nothing. No follow up by the OIG or the Government Accountability Office. In fact, we have not heard from the GAO since their 2005 report suggesting whether a second supplier of currency paper is needed (see GAO-05-368).
Of course it is easy for the BEP to say that Crane & Co., the Dalton, Massachusetts company that has been the exclusive currency paper supplier since 1879, because it would be easy to justify. Some of the arguments against finding a second supplier includes the cost of entering the market and the established relationship with Crane who the BEP allows to “own” the innovations paid with taxpayer money. There was also the case of having two of the most powerful senators, Ted Kennedy and John Kerry, there to protect Crane. Neither are the senators from Massachusetts today.
While the BEP has been struggling with rag-bond paper, countries have been moving to using polymer “paper.”. The polymer “paper” was developed by the Reserve Bank of Australia to enhance the durability of the notes and to incorporate security features not possible with paper or rag-based paper. RBA has been distributing polymer notes since 1992. While the polymer substrate costs little more and the production is only marginally more expensive, the benefit will come from the reduction in counterfeiting and the durability of the note. Polymer will last three-to-six times longer than rag-based paper.
The Bank of Canada has reissued its C$100, C$50, and C$20 notes using the polymer paper and will issue the new C$5 and C$10 notes later this year.
Switching to polymer notes, especially for higher denominations, would be a better decision. It will reduce counterfeiting and reduce the costs over the lifetime of the note. And there is no law that would prevent the Federal Reserve from using the polymer paper.
Considering the Bureau of Engraving and Printing’s previous performance with the $100 notes, this should not be consider the time to celebrate. Especially since a pre-solicitation notice asking for information about purchasing a Single Note Inspection System is still open at FedBizOpps.gov and the BEP has not issued a request for proposal (RFP) to purchase such a system. Let’s wait for the BEP to deliver the notes to the Federal Reserve for distribution before considering this a success.
While waiting, enjoy this video announcement narrated by Federal Reserve Deputy Associate Director Michael Lambert about the new release date.
Images courtesy of the Bureau of Engraving and Printing. Video courtesy of the Federal Reserve.
To understand the post’s true condition, you have to consider the following:
The Chairman of the Federal Reserve is Ben S. Bernanke. His first name is really Ben, not Benjamin.
The law requires the Federal Reserve to distribute the one-dollar note. Only congress can vote to stop producing the note.
The Acting Director of the U.S. Mint is Richard A. Peterson, not Pederson.
Seignorage is deposited in the Public Enterprise Fund. No, the leaving out of the “d” in the original post was not a typo because I was having fun!
The Director of the Bureau of Engraving and Printing is Larry Felix. I do not know a Larry Felinks. Maybe he is a long lost cousin of the director?
The company that supplies currency paper to the BEP is “Crane and Company.” The Sandhill Crane Company does not exist, but there is a bird called the sandhill crane. There is also a blue crane, but I am reasonably sure that there is no such person as Violet “Blue” Crane; or at least there is not one associated with Crane and Company. Maybe there is a Blue Crane working for Sandhill Crane? There is a joke in there that can use “Whooping Crane” which I will leave as an exercise to the reader!
Finally, when was the last time you heard the Fed Chairman concerned with coin collectors? The last line was added to emphasize the date.
In other words:
Besides, who is giving a blogger an exclusive story that does not appear elsewhere? Like the Orson Well’s broadcast of The War of the Worlds, all you had to do is change the channel (or check another source).
Obverse of the 2009-present Native American Dollar
In a move that will shake the markets for time to come, Federal Reserve Chairman Benjamin S. Bernanke announced that the Federal Reserve and its member banks will no longer order one dollar Federal Reserve Notes from the Bureau of Engraving and Printing. To replace the paper, the Fed will start to distribute the over one billion one-dollar coins currently being stored in the money storage facilities around the country.
“We have so many dollar coins, it makes sense to find a way to get them into circulation,” Bernanke said. “It will also help reduce the storage requirements to hold these coins.”
Bernanke, who has been both complemented and reviled over the Fed’s handling of the Great Recession, said that now that the economy was more solid, he would turn his attention to doing what he can for the federal government. Citing the GAO report that estimated the federal government could save at least $4.4 billion by using coins rather than money, Bernanke will use his power as Chairman of the Fed to determine the independent bank’s policy over circulating money.
“Not only will this keep our facilities busy but it will help the U.S. Mint maintain and increase its profitability,” said Richard A. Pederson, Acting Director of the U.S. Mint. “The reduction of dollar coins previous ordered by [then Treasury Secretary Tim] Geithner really hurt our bottom line. It significantly lowered our seigniorage and the size of our deposit into our Public Enterprise Fun.”
Pederson assured Bernanke that the U.S. Mint will be able to meet the new demand for circulating dollar coins.
Director of the Bureau of Engraving and Printing Larry Felinks said that this change will help increase productivity in other areas of their operation. “Printing of the one dollar note is over 50-percent of our production. This reduction will allow us to concentrate on other projects including trying to figure out why we have not been able to produce $100 notes.”
“Obviously, we are not happy about this,” said Violet “Blue” Crane, family spokesperson for the Sandhill Crane Company who manufactures the paper for the Bureau of Engraving and Printing. “Manufacturing paper for the one dollar bill was half of our business and gave us the most profit since that paper did not have to include anti-counterfeiting features.”
The U.S. Secret Service declined to comment for this story and any other story they were asked about.
Bernanke, sitting in his office obviously pleased with his new policy, also understood the impact of his decision on the numismatic industry. Leaning back in his chair, Bernanke closed with, “Collectors of United States coins will remember April 1, 2013 as the day I gave their dollar coin collection more meaning.”
Native American Dollar image courtesy of the U.S. Mint.
We end numismatic 2012 almost the same way as we began, discussing what to do about the one-dollar coins. The over production lead to a quite a number of bills introduced in congress to try to fix the perceived problem but none ever made it to a hearing, let alone out of a hearing. Rather, the U.S. Mint hired Current Technologies Corp. (CTC) to perform an alternative metals study required by congress.
When the U.S. Mint finally published the report and a summary they made a recommendation to study the problems further because they could not find suitable alternatives to the current alloys used. While reading the summary gives the impression that the request is reasonable, the full 400-page report describes the extensive testing and analysis that the U.S. Mint and CTC performed leaving the reader curious as to why they were unable to come to some sort of conclusion—except that there is no “perfect” solution. This is a story that will continue into 2013 and be on the agenda for the 113th congress when it is seated on January 3, 2013.
The other part of the discussion is whether or not to end the production of the one-dollar Federal Reserve Note. It was the last hearing before the House Financial Services subcommittee on Domestic Monetary Policy and Technology for Rep. Ron Paul (R-TX) and the 112th congress that will certainly carry over into 2013.
This does not mean the Bureau of Engraving and Printing is without its controversy. In order to comply with the court order as part of American Council for the Blind v. Paulson (No. 07-5063; D.C. Cir. May 20, 2008 [PDF]) and the subsequent injunction (No. 02-0864 (JR); D.C. Cir. October 3, 2008 [PDF]), the BEP has been working to provide “Meaningful Access” to United States currency.
Secretary of the Treasury Timothy F. Geithner approved the methods that will be used to assist the blind and visually impaired to U.S. currency on May 31, 2011. In addition to examining tactile features, high contrast printing, and currency readers, the BEP issued a Request for Information for additional information to implement their plan. The BEP will be participating at stakeholder organization meetings to socialize and refine their plans. There will probably be few announcements before the conventions of the National Federation of the Blind and American Council of the Blind this summer.
Another building controversy from the BEP is whether the redesigned $100 notes will find its way into circulation. Introduced in April 2010, full production has been delayed because of folding during the printing process. The situation has to be so severe that the BEP has not announced a new release date and delayed releasing the 2011 CFO Report [PDF] to the end of Fiscal Year 2012 while finding a way to bury the scope and costs of the delays. Will the redesigned $100 Federal Reserve Note be issued in 2013? Stay tuned!
Staying with currency issues, there should be a new series of notes when a new Secretary of the Treasury is appointed. It is known that the current Secretary Timothy F. Geithner wants to pursue other options. If the BEP follows its past practice, notes with the new Secretary of the Treasury’s signature would be Series 2009A notes. There have been no reports as to whether Treasurer Rosie Rios will continue in her position.
As for other products, the BEP will continue to issue specially packaged notes using serial numbers that are either lucky numbers (i.e., “777”) or ones that begin with “2013” as part of their premium products. Of course they will continue to issue their sets of uncut currency.
Another carry over from 2012 will be whether the U.S. Mint will issue palladium coins that were authorized by the American Eagle Palladium Bullion Coin Act of 2010 (Public Law No: 111-303 [Text] [PDF]). The law requires that the U.S. Mint study of the viability of issuing palladium bullion coins under the Act. That report was due to congress on December 14, 2012 but has not been made public at this time.
Bibiana Boerio was nominated to be the Director of the U.S. Mint.
One final bit of unfinished business from 2012 is the nomination of Bibi Boerio to be the 39th Director of the U.S. Mint. The former Chief Financial Officer of Ford Motor Credit and Managing Director of Jaguar Cars Ltd. has recently been a Special Advisor to the President of the Detroit Regional Chamber of Commerce while waiting for the Senate to confirm her nomination. The Senate will have quite a few presidential nominations on its agenda that will he taken up in the new congress.
Other than the higher prices for silver products, the U.S. Mint should not generate controversies for its 2013 coin offerings. There will be no changes for the cent, nickel, dime, and half dollar with the half dollar only being struck for collectors since it has not been needed for circulation since 2002. These coins will be seen in uncirculated and proof sets with silver versions for the silver sets.
There has been no confirmation from the U.S. Mint whether they will strike San Francisco “S” Mint quarters for the collector community as they did in 2012.
American Eagle coin programs will continue with the bullion, collector uncirculated, and proof coins for both the silver and gold. The American Eagle Platinum bullion coin will continue to use its regular reverse while the American Eagle Platinum Proof will continue with the Preamble Series. The Preamble Series is a six year program to commemorate the core concepts of the American democracy as outline in the preamble of the U.S. constitution. For 2013, the reverse will be emblematic of the principle “To Promote the General Welfare.” The U.S. Mint has not issued a design at this time.
Currently, there are no announced special products or sets using American Eagle coins and no announced plan for special strikings such as reverse proofs or “S” mint marks.
Obverse of the 2009-present Native American Dollar
There has been a lot of misinformation by the media about what was said during the hearing before the House Financial Services subcommittee on Domestic Monetary Policy and Technology on November 29. It is difficult to believe that these alleged journalists had investigated anything beyond their keyboards making simple online searches.
Let’s look at the drivel about eliminating the dollar coins:
Replacing the dollar bill with a coin will not save money.
A summary of these arguments could be read on the Wonk Blog at The Washington Post. As I read the argument against, there is a lot of phrases with qualifiers like “if” and “may” that does not provide a solid feeling of deep analysis.
The bottom line is that for every dollar coin the U.S. Mint strikes, the government collects 72½ cents per coin. On the other hand, the Bureau of Engraving and Printing prints each note for around 8 cents per note but does not charge the Federal Reserve $1 for each note. By cost, the U.S. government makes more on seigniorage for the coin than the currency.
Converting to coins from the paper currency will cost the Fed more to purchase the dollar coin over printing currency. However, the Fed is not a government agency and does not use taxpayer money for its operations. It uses money earned off of its banking operations and turns over a percentage of its profits to the United States Treasury. While this will lower the amount of profit, it will be made up by the additional seigniorage.
People have not forgotten the Susan B. Anthony dollar coin… failed to wean Americans from the dollar bill because it looked too much like a quarter.
When I read this in an editorial from my hometown The New York Times, I scratched my head and wondered what happened to The Old Grey Lady. What used to be a forward thinking newspaper sounds like the elderly neighbor chewing his gums yelling at you to “get off my lawn.” What The Times forgot is that following the problems the design of the Susie B’s caused, congress authorized changes to prevent those issues from reoccurring by changing the coin’s color and using a smooth edge rather than a reeded edge.
I challenge The Times editorial board to handle a quarter and a post-2000 dollar while reconsidering their misguided editorial.
Why worry about the dollar because more people are using credit cards
A story in Bloomberg points out the savings may be limited because of the reduced number of dollar notes being produced. The writer credits the increased use of credit cards as a reason. However, reports show that consumer credit card debt has gone down every month since October 2008 until the first rise in October 2012.
The record shows that Americans have used their credit cards less and the use of cash has increased until these last few months while the Bureau of Economic Analysis reports wages have increased modestly during the slow recovery. In other words, the Bloomberg report does not hold up against facts.
It will not save the government money because it is a transfer costs.
Once again, some “analyst” at National Public Radio over thinks the issue with wrong data. NPR’s Jacob Goldstein writes that it is not a cost savings to the government because of shift from the production by the Bureau of Engraving and Printing to the U.S. Mint. However, his conclusion is based on the assumption that the seigniorage is the same for printing the note as it is for striking the coin. It is not, as we discussed earlier.
A better way to save money is by eliminating 1-cent coins entirely.
An interesting thing happens when the government tries to tackle an issue is that you get alleged pundits like Mike Rosen making irrelevant arguments based on an tangential premiss. The reason why Rosen’s writing is inconsequential is that the discussion is replacing one form of a dollar for another not eliminating a denomination. If the time comes to discuss the elimination of a denomination, then we can learn from the 1856 discussion that lead to the elimination of the half-cent. Otherwise, trying to justify eliminating a denomination using the discussion to replace the representation of another is an exercise in twisted logic.
That fancy money clip you inherited from your grandfather would be useless.
From Boston, Jon Keller writes that it is not culturally possible to change from notes to coins. Keller is indicative of alleged analysts who are thinking with their head up the past and not providing anything but his emotional reasoning for not making the change.
This goes along with the arguments that Americans do not want to change that will put more change in their pocket. These people say that Americans do not want the coin and will resist this move. But if you look at reality, Americans are all about change. In the last 50 years we gave up our silver coinage, went from muscle cars to more fuel efficient cars, brought in and (thankfully) dumped disco, changed the Lincoln cent from copper to copper-plated zinc, handled the end of the Cold War while ushering in the era of terrorism, and adapted to life post 9/11/01. There have been floods, droughts, hurricanes, tornadoes, mega-storms, and earthquakes that has show the resiliency of the American people. To ask Americans to adapt to using coins instead of notes is a pittance compared to everything else.
Take away our dollar bills, and our assault rifles will be next.
I do not believe in conspiracy theories but there some who are not afraid to spout this insolence. It is an argument based on false equivalency based on being unaware of the legal mechanisms of how the government works.
If anyone has a real reason based on documented fact to support saving the paper dollar for the coin, I welcome their argument below.
On February 25, 1863, President Abraham Lincoln signed the National Bank Act of 1863 that created a single currency standard for the United States where the notes would be backed by the United States Treasury and printed by the federal government. The result of this act lead to the establishment of the National Currency Bureau which was later rename to the Bureau of Engraving and Printing.
The Spink Auction was held on October 2, 2012 in their London offices. None of the nine Canadian test notes printed on DuraNote were sold.
After it was announced that Spink of London will auction sheets of DuraNote trial printings from the Bank of Canada, BEP told CoinWorld that they printed as many as 40,000 sheets of Federal Reserve Notes using the DuraNote substrate.
DuraNote was a product of Mobil Chemical and AGRA Vadeko of Canada. Trials of DuraNote were not successful and the project was abandoned. Patents for DuraNote were sold following the Exxon-Mobil merger.
Around the same time, the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) developed a polymer substrate with a different formula that went into production in 1992. Since then, Australia has been successfully printing polymer notes.
In the mean time, there continues to be issues with folding of the paper specially designed for the new $100 Federal Reserve Note. Since the October 1, 2010 announcement by the Fed of the folding issue, the Fed and BEP has less than forthcoming on the status of the new note including the BEP withholding their annual report for fiscal year 2011 so they do not have to disclose how many of these notes they have in inventory.
The paper being used by the BEP is manufactured by Crane & Company who has had the exclusive contract with the BEP since 1879.
Where DuraNote failed RBA succeeded in creating a workable technology that is being adopted world wide. With the new $100 note having printing problems, why has the BEP not looked into the RBA polymer substrate for U.S. currency? Why does the Federal Reserve, BEP, and Secret Service cling to 19th and 20th century printing technologies in the 21st century? Or is this a matter of the influence being purchased [PDF] by Crane & Company in order to maintain its monopoly.
Maybe it is time for the Fed and the BEP to re-examine their commitment to paper and stop wasting time and money with failed technologies.
Those of us here in the Washington, DC area who work with or for the Federal Government knows that this week is the home stretch to the end of the fiscal year. Many of us who work for the government are not directly involved with the political infighting that makes the national news. Federal employees are prohibited to be involved with politics by law and contractors usually have employer policies that limit their political activities.
One thing we worry about is the funding issues that have not been resolved. Although the news reported that congress has passed a continuing resolution to fund the government for six months, what the reports did not say is that the continuing funding are only at the levels negotiated last year which rolled back funding to Fiscal Year 2007 (FY07) levels. FY07 dollars do not have the same buying power as today’s dollars and the amount of work required by the laws passed by congress have increased.
You might have heard about the budget “sequestration.” Sequestration is the mechanism that was instituted as part of the Budget Control Act of 2011 to force congress to negotiate a budget or automatic, across the board cuts totaling $1.2 trillion will go into effect on January 1, 2013. Sequestration has made a lot of people in the DC area nervous because it will cause contractors to cut jobs. In fact, with the uncertainty of sequestration, large contractors, like Lockheed-Martin, are providing 90 day layoff notices they are required to give employees when defense and other security-related contracts are ended early.
For the money manufacturing operations under the Department of the Treasury, there should not be any problems from sequestration because the U.S. Mint and the Bureau of Engraving and Printing are profitable agencies that uses their profits for operations. If there are shortfalls in providing funding for operations, the Secretary of the Treasury is allowed to withdraw funds from the Public Enterprise Funds (the accounts where the profits are deposited).
Problems remain for both agencies. The most significant of the issues are the problems with printing the new $100 Federal Reserve Notes. BEP continues to report that the new notes have folding issues that have delayed their release for two years. Inquiries by numismatic industry news outlets have reported that the problems are still under investigation and that no new release date has been set.
The U.S. Mint recently reported striking problems with the First Spouse Gold Coins. Apparently, the design caused metal flow problems in trial strikes that caused delays in releasing the coins. While the U.S. Mint has said they rectified the problems, the coins have not been issued.
In addition to the coining problems, the U.S. Mint also suspended its attempt to update its technology infrastructure. After receiving the responses from a formal Request For Information (RFI), the U.S. Mint pulled back on its attempt to update its infrastructure and online ordering services to re-examine the requirements and the business processes that would be part of that contract. The U.S. Mint press office said that they had no further information other than what has been published. They did confirm that the RFI responses will not be released because they contain proprietary information that is protected from public release.
It is difficult to know whether the federal budget situation will effect the U.S. Mint and BEP or whether the attempt to reduce costs in order to ensure they do not access more money from their respective Public Enterprise Funds. This is because money in excess of budgeted operations plus a reserve must be withdrawn from these Public Enterprise Funds and deposited in to the general treasury accounts at the discretion of the Secretary of the Treasury (31 U.S.C. § 5136 for the U.S. Mint and 31 U.S.C. § 5142 for the BEP). It is reasonable to question the management of these funds in the light of the federal budget situation.
Right now, the way the BEP and the Federal Reserve has handled the situation with the new $100 note suggests there is more to that issue than meets the eye. Nether the BEP or the Fed are answering question and the BEP did not issue an annual report for 2011 which would have to report on the production of the $100 notes. Inquiries to the BEP were returned with a reply that the report “is not ready.”
The annual reports for both these bureaus will make for interesting reading, if the BEP produces one for 2012.
In the ongoing drama that is United States Federal government, a shutdown is looming over the shear idiocy of idiot-loges on both sides of the aisle attempting the rule and not govern. All 537 politicians elected to federal office are in need of a good spanking.
Loading ...